From cost cutting to strategic efficiency
Most companies think of service efficiency as cost cutting: fewer agents per ticket, shorter conversations, cheaper tools. The problem: these measures affect both sides of the equation – using fewer agents per ticket, for example, either lowers quality or increases wait time.
Strategic efficiency looks at the bigger picture: how do we create more value with the same resources? Which requests need human expertise, which can be automated, and where does self-service help? The numbers show this approach works better if you want to save today and still have customers tomorrow:
What strategically applied automation delivers:
- Companies reduce service operating costs through AI and automation by 20–30% (McKinsey)
- AI-powered automation can significantly reduce response and handling times (IBM)
- Best-in-class contact centers achieve FCR rates of around 70–75% – three out of four requests resolved at first contact (HDI)
- AI-powered personalization can increase customer satisfaction by 15–20% (McKinsey)
The challenge isn’t replacing people with machines. It’s deciding which requests benefit from automation, which need self-service, and where personal interaction makes the difference.
More on the strategic framework: Develop a customer service strategy →Tactical vs. strategic efficiency: What’s the difference?
Tactical efficiency optimizes individual measures in the here and now. Strategic efficiency decides what your service should look like in two years – and which investments you need to make today to get there.
| Area | Tactical | Strategic |
|---|---|---|
| Hiring | Hire two new agents because ticket volume is increasing. | Develop a scaling model that defines which requests must be automated before new agents are hired. |
| Tools | Buy a cheaper ticketing system to reduce license costs. | Define the processes first, then choose the tool that supports them best – with a clear ROI target. |
| KPIs | Lower average handle time (AHT) because it’s showing up red in the dashboard. | Measure which requests actually take time and why – then fix structural causes instead of symptoms. |
| Processes | Create macros for the 10 most common requests. | Develop a self-service strategy that defines which requests should be solvable without human interaction. |
Efficiency metrics that actually matter
Not all KPIs are equally meaningful. Some show symptoms, others reveal the true performance of your service setup. These metrics belong in every strategic dashboard:
Sources: IBM, Zendesk, HDI, SQM, Gartner – 2023–2025
Take your service to the next level
Three structural levers make the difference: automating the right requests, treating self-service as a strategic priority, and intelligent routing. Each one works – when applied correctly.
Strategies to improve service efficiency
The following strategies help you make your customer service sustainably more efficient – without sacrificing quality.
Recurring, standardized tasks are ideal for automation. They create room for agents to focus on complex and emotional requests – where human expertise really matters.
- Ticket routing: Automatically assigning tickets to the right department or agent
- Standard replies: Macros for frequent requests (e.g., shipping status, return policy)
- Follow-up emails: Automated follow-ups after ticket resolution
- Escalation workflows: Automatic escalation for SLA breaches
Self-service reduces incoming tickets and relieves the team. 67% of customers prefer to solve problems themselves – as long as solutions are easy to find and up to date.
- Comprehensive help center: Articles for common questions, step-by-step guides, video tutorials
- Chatbots: For initial triage and simple requests – with a clear escalation path to a human
- Community forums: Customers help each other, moderated by your team
- FAQ pages: Well structured, prominently placed, regularly updated
Data shows where efficiency potential exists. Regular analysis helps identify weak points and improve them deliberately – instead of relying on gut feeling.
- First contact resolution (FCR): How many requests are resolved at first contact? Benchmark: 70–75%
- Average handle time (AHT): How long does the average handling take – and why?
- Ticket volume by category: Which topics generate the most requests – and are they automatable?
- Escalation rate: How many requests end up in tier 2 or with specialists?
Well-trained agents resolve requests faster and more efficiently. They need not only product know-how, but also an understanding of processes, tools, and communication.
- Product and service knowledge: Regular updates on new features, processes, and policies
- Tool proficiency: Efficient use of the ticketing system, CRM, and other tools
- Soft skills: Communication, empathy, conflict resolution
- Problem solving: Finding solutions independently instead of escalating constantly
Not every channel is equally suitable for every request. Strategic channel choice lowers cost and improves customer experience – omnichannel doesn’t mean all channels are equally important.
Customer feedback shows what works and what doesn’t. Post-ticket surveys, NPS surveys, and qualitative interviews provide valuable insights – if they’re actively translated into improvements.
- Identify weak points: Which topics repeatedly cause frustration?
- Adjust processes: Where do customers lose time unnecessarily or have to repeat themselves?
- Improve self-service: Which information is missing in the help center?
- Agent training: Where are there knowledge gaps in the team that show up in feedback?
- ✓ Objective external assessment of your service setup
- ✓ Quick wins you can implement immediately
- ✓ Prioritized roadmap for the next 6 months
- ✓ Clarity and confidence to act instead of a strategy document
Common mistakes in service efficiency
Efficiency initiatives often fail for the same reasons. Avoid these:
Best practices: What successful companies do differently
Companies that approach service efficiency strategically follow certain patterns. These best practices pay off measurably:
Conclusion: Think strategically about efficiency – not just cutting costs
Service efficiency doesn’t mean saving everywhere. It means using resources wisely: automation for routine tasks, self-service for frequent questions, and human expertise for complex cases. The numbers show strategic efficiency works – when it’s implemented correctly.
The three core levers – automation, self-service, and intelligent routing – don’t work in isolation. They reinforce each other and create a system that scales profitably without lowering quality or overloading the team.
Next steps:
Strategic efficiency begins with clarity
Many teams know that their service could be more efficient, but they don’t know where to start. This is where we come in: we analyse structures, key figures and processes and show specifically where automation, self-service or routing are real levers – and where they are not.
Let’s start with a structured basis for decision-making:
- Which requests belong where?
- Where are unnecessary costs being incurred?
- Which investments really pay off in terms of scaling?
If you want to develop your service profitably, we will look at your status quo together – and define the next sensible steps.
Robert Cwicinski
Customer service expert
- Customer service strategy
- Digital Transformation
- Business Intelligence / BI
- CRM
- Automation
- Integration
- Custom MVPs
Frequently asked questions
- Cost per contact: Average cost per service interaction
- Self-service rate: How many requests are resolved without a ticket?
- First contact resolution (FCR): How many requests are resolved at first contact? (Benchmark: 70–75%)
- Escalation rate: How many requests end up in tier 2?
- Agent utilization: How productive is the team? (Benchmark: 85%)
- Degree of automation: What percentage of requests run through automation?
- Quick wins (macros, expanding FAQs): immediately up to 2 weeks
- Building self-service: 4–8 weeks before first results become visible
- Automation: 3–6 months for full implementation and optimization
- Structural transformation: 6–12 months
- The team is growing faster than revenue
- Service costs per customer are increasing
- Ticket volume is growing disproportionately
- Escalations are increasing
- First contact resolution is declining
- The team is permanently overloaded
Better: Start small with the most common routine requests. Document processes. Roll out automation step by step. Measure whether it’s working. Then scale.
- Content is outdated or incomplete
- Search doesn’t work well
- Articles are hard to find (poor navigation)
- Content is too technical or too vague
- Define a baseline: cost per contact, ticket volume, agent hours before the initiative
- Calculate the investment: time, tools, external support
- Measure after 3–6 months: how have the metrics changed?
- Calculate ROI: (savings − investment) / investment × 100
Example: investment €20,000 → savings €50,000/year → ROI after year 1: 150%. Companies report significantly positive ROI from strategic automation (McKinsey).
